Defamation, Insult, and Disclosure under the UAE Crimes and Penalties Law

AUTHOR VERIFICATION
Written & reviewed by

Leaders Advocates

Founder Partner Leaders Advocates, Dubai
knowledge Updated May 4, 2026
D
efamation, Insult, and Disclosure under the UAE Crimes and Penalties Law
Scope of criminalization, methods of commission, and when liability does not apply

Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 issuing the UAE Crimes and Penalties Law sets a clear framework to protect honour, reputation, and social standing against acts of defamation and insult, while also recognizing limited situations where criminal liability is excluded. This framework appears in Articles (425) to (429), which distinguish between attributing a specific fact by publicity, using insulting expressions without attributing a fact, the impact of the communication method (phone, face-to-face with others present, or messages), and the boundaries of truth-proof and lawful defence before judicial bodies.

Defamation by publicity

Under Article (425) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021, a person is punishable by imprisonment for up to two years or a fine of up to AED 20,000 if they attribute to another person, by any method of publicity, a fact that would make that person liable to punishment or subject to contempt. The offence, as set out in the article, is tied to attributing a “fact” and doing so through a public method that exposes the victim to social condemnation or legal consequences.

The same Article (425) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 elevates the penalty to imprisonment and/or a fine where defamation is committed against a public official or a person entrusted with a public service during, because of, or in connection with duty or public service, or where it is affecting honour, harmful to the reputation of families, or noted to pursue an unlawful purpose. The article also treats defamation committed by publication in newspapers or printed materials as an aggravating circumstance.

Insult without attributing a specific fact

Article (426) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 deals with insult committed by publicity where the offender accuses another in a way that harms honour or dignity without attributing a specific fact. The basic penalty is imprisonment for up to one year or a fine of up to AED 20,000.

The same Article (426) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 increases the penalty to imprisonment for up to two years and a fine not less than AED 20,000 and not more than AED 50,000, or either penalty, if the insult is directed at a public official or a person entrusted with a public service in relation to duty, or where it affects honour, harms the reputation of families, or is noted to pursue an unlawful purpose. Publication in newspapers or printed materials is also considered an aggravating circumstance under this article.

The role of the communication method

Article (427) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 further differentiates the penalties for defamation or insult based on the method and setting. If the act occurs by telephone, or face-to-face with the victim while others are present, the penalty is imprisonment for up to six months or a fine of up to AED 5,000. This reflects the greater reputational impact when the statement is delivered through a medium or setting that exposes it to third parties.

However, if defamation or insult occurs in the victim’s presence with no one else present, or in a message sent to the victim by any means, the penalty is limited to a fine of up to AED 5,000. The article then states that the offence is considered aggravated in these same scenarios if committed against a public official or public service appointee in connection with duty, or if it affects honour, harms family reputation, or pursues an unlawful purpose.

Truth-proof in a limited public-office context

Article (428) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 sets out a key limitation on criminal liability: the offence does not apply if the offender proves the truth of the attributed fact, provided that the allegation is directed at a public official or a person entrusted with a public service and that the fact is connected to the function or service. In this situation, proof of insult may also be accepted if it originates from the offender and is linked to the defamation fact.

At the same time, the article restricts proof where the fact is older than five years, where the crime has been extinguished by law, or where the issued judgment has lapsed—placing clear legal boundaries on when truth-proof is allowed.

Protection of the right of defence

Finally, Article (429) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021 provides that no crime exists in what parties state in their oral or written defence before courts or investigation authorities within the limits of the right of defence. This establishes a safeguard so that lawful litigation defence does not turn into criminal exposure, as long as it stays within that defined scope.

Overall takeaway

 

Through Articles (425)–(429) of Federal Decree-Law No. (31) of 2021, UAE law draws a structured line between defamation and insult, attaches penalties based on publicity and method, and then sets carefully defined exceptions tied to public-office accountability (truth-proof) and legitimate defence before judicial bodies.

 

 

 

Piter Bowman

Creative approach to every project

 

    Leave a comment